<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Acceptance Criteria | welding &amp; NDT</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.weldingandndt.com/category/acceptance-criteria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.weldingandndt.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 06:20:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Acceptance Criteria for Weld Defects</title>
		<link>https://www.weldingandndt.com/acceptance-criteria-for-weld-defects/</link>
					<comments>https://www.weldingandndt.com/acceptance-criteria-for-weld-defects/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandeep Anand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2019 13:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Acceptance Criteria]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.weldingandndt.com/?p=1186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article, the weld defect acceptance/rejection criteria are given for the following tests/NDT; 1. Acceptance criteria for Visual Inspection</p>
The post <a href="https://www.weldingandndt.com/acceptance-criteria-for-weld-defects/">Acceptance Criteria for Weld Defects</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.weldingandndt.com">welding & NDT</a>.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article, the weld defect acceptance/rejection criteria are given for the following tests/NDT;</p>
<h6><span style="color: #008000;"><strong style="text-align: center;">1. Acceptance criteria for Visual Inspection</strong></span></h6>
<h6><span style="color: #008000;"><strong style="text-align: center;">2. Acceptance criteria for Radiography Test (RT)</strong></span></h6>
<h6><span style="color: #008000;"><strong style="text-align: center;">3. Acceptance criteria for Ultrasonic Test (UT)</strong></span></h6>
<h6><span style="color: #008000;"><strong style="text-align: center;">4. Acceptance criteria for Liquid Penetrant Test (LPT/LPI/DPT)</strong></span></h6>
<h6><span style="color: #008000;"><strong style="text-align: center;">5. Acceptance criteria for Magnetic Particle Test (MPI/MPT/MT)</strong></span></h6>
<p>(This article covers the weld defect acceptance criteria as per <strong>ASME Section VIII Div 1, </strong>which is one of the most widely used standards for acceptance criteria for weld defects)</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><u>Acceptance criteria for Visual Inspection</u></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>(Refer: UIG-97, Page – 345 of ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1, 2017 Edition.)</strong></span></p>
<p>(a) The surface shall be free of any visible laminations, spalling, or cracks. Cracks in tubes shall not be repaired and shall be considered cause for rejection.</p>
<p>(b) For tubes, the depth of scratch shall not exceed 1/32 in. (0.8 mm). For all other material, the scratch depth shall not exceed 1/8 in. (3 mm).</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>For an acceptable limit of thickness reduction, Refer to UW-35 (sub-para b, page – 144) which states that:</strong></span></p>
<ul>
<li>The reduction in thickness shall not exceed 1mm (1/32 in.) or 10% of material nominal thickness whichever is less, provided that the material of the adjoining surfaces below the design thickness at any point.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>For the allowable limit of Weld Reinforcement (excess weld metal), Refer to UW-35 (sub-para d, Page – 144)</strong></span></p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1201" src="https://www.weldingandndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Reinforcement-1.png" alt="" width="719" height="473" srcset="https://www.weldingandndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Reinforcement-1.png 719w, https://www.weldingandndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Reinforcement-1-300x197.png 300w, https://www.weldingandndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Reinforcement-1-200x132.png 200w, https://www.weldingandndt.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Reinforcement-1-250x164.png 250w" sizes="(max-width: 719px) 100vw, 719px" /></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">*************************</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><u>Acceptance criteria for Radiography Test (RT)</u></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>(Refer: UW-51: Sub Para b (Page 148 and 149) and Mandatory Appendix 4 (Page 400 and Page 403) of ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1, 2017 Edition.)</strong></span></p>
<p>Following terminologies have been used to explain the acceptance/rejection criteria for Radiography Test (RT);</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Linear Indication:</strong></span> Any indication with a length greater than three times the width. Linear indications are mainly cracks, lack of penetration, lack of fusion, and elongated slag inclusions.</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Rounded Indication:</strong></span> Any indication with a length equal to or less than three times the width. A rounded indication may be circular, elliptical, conical, or irregular in shape and may have tails too. While determining the size of an indication, the tail shall also be included. Rounded indications may appear on radiographs from any imperfection in the weld, such as porosity, slag, or tungsten.</p>
<h4><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Acceptance criteria for Linear Indication (UW – 51):</strong></span></h4>
<p>1. Any crack, lack of penetration, and lack of fusion shall not be accepted</p>
<p>2. Any other elongated indication shall be considered unacceptable, which has a length greater than;</p>
<ul>
<li>6 mm (1/4 in.) for T up to 19 mm (3/4 in.)</li>
<li>T/3 for T greater than or equal to 19 mm (3/4 in.) and less than or equal to 57 mm (2-1/4 in.) i.e. 19 mm ≤ T ≤ 57 mm.</li>
<li>19 mm (3/4 in.) for T greater than 57 mm (2-1/4 in.)</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>(Where, ‘T’ – Thickness of the weld metal excluding any allowable reinforcement).</strong></span></p>
<p>3. Any group of indications (inline) with an aggregate length of more than T (within a length of 12T) shall be considered unacceptable except when the distance between the successive discontinuities exceeds 6L.</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>(where ‘L’ is the length of the longest imperfection in the group).</strong></span></p>
<h4><span style="color: #0000ff;">Acceptance criteria for Rounded Indication (Mandatory Appendix 4):</span></h4>
<p>According to this appendix, those rounded indications which exceed the following dimensions shall be considered relevant.</p>
<ul>
<li>T/10 for T less than 3 mm (1/8 in.)</li>
<li>0.5 mm (1/64 in.) for T from 3 mm to 6 mm (1/8 in. to 1/4 in.), inclusive</li>
<li>1.0 mm (1/32 in.) for t greater than 6 mm to 50 mm (1/4 in. to 2 in.), inclusive</li>
<li>1.5 mm (1/16 in.) for T greater than 50 mm (2 in.)</li>
</ul>
<p>Apart from the above conditions, Mandatory Appendix 4 also contains some tables, charts, and figures as a reference for acceptance/rejection criteria.</p>
<h6><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Please watch the video (given below) for more clarity on acceptance criteria for the Radiography test (RT);</strong></span></h6>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/FXv5M5kON9M" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://youtu.be/FXv5M5kON9M</a></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">*************************</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><u>Acceptance criteria for Ultrasonic Test (UT)</u></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>(Refer: Mandatory Appendix 12 (Page 435) of ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1, 2017 Edition.)</strong></span></p>
<p>(a) Indications characterized as cracks, lack of fusion, or incomplete penetration are unacceptable regardless of length.</p>
<p>(b) Other imperfections are unacceptable if the indications exceed the reference level amplitude and have lengths that exceed:</p>
<ul>
<li>6 mm (1/4 in.) for T up to 19 mm (3/4 in.)</li>
<li>T/3 for T from 19 mm to 57 mm (3/4 in. to 21/4 in.)</li>
<li>19 mm (3/4 in.) for T over 57 mm (21/4 in.)</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>where T is the thickness of the weld excluding any allowable reinforcement</strong></span>. For a butt weld joining two members having different thicknesses at the weld, T is the thinner of these two thicknesses. If a full penetration weld includes a fillet weld, the thickness of the throat of the fillet shall be included in T.</p>
<h6><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Please watch the video (given below) for more clarity on acceptance criteria for the Ultrasonic test (UT);</strong></span></h6>
<p><iframe title="[English] Acceptance criteria for Ultrasonic test (ASME section VIII Div I)" width="800" height="450" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/86pNXR1sU6E?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">*************************</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><u>Acceptance criteria for Liquid Penetrant Test</u></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>(Refer: Mandatory Appendix 8 (Page 417) of ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1, 2017 Edition.)</strong></span></p>
<p>The following terminologies have been used to explain the acceptance/rejection criteria for Liquid Penetrant Examination (PT).</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Relevant Indications:</strong></span> Indications with major dimensions greater than 1.5 mm (1/16 in.) shall be considered relevant.</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Linear Indication:</strong></span> Any indication with a length greater than three times the width.</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Rounded Indication:</strong></span> Any indication with a length equal to or less than three times the width. A rounded indication may be of circular or elliptical shape.</p>
<h4><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Acceptance Criteria for Liquid Penetrant Examination (Mandatory Appendix 8):</strong></span></h4>
<p>All surfaces to be examined shall be free of:</p>
<p>(a) Relevant linear indications shall be rejected.</p>
<p>(b) Relevant rounded indications greater than 5 mm (3/16 in.) shall be rejected.</p>
<p>(c) Four or more relevant rounded indications in a line separated by 1.5 mm (1/16 in.) or less (edge to edge).</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;">*************************</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><u>Acceptance criteria for Magnetic Particle Test (MT)</u></strong></span></h3>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>(Refer Mandatory Appendix 6 (Page 412) of ASME BPVC Section VIII Div 1, 2017 Edition. Acceptance criteria are the same as that of Liquid Penetrant Examination)</strong></span></p>
<p>The following terminologies have been used to explain the acceptance/rejection criteria for Magnetic Particle Test (PT).</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Relevant Indications:</strong> </span>Indications with major dimensions greater than 1.5 mm (1/16 in.) shall be considered relevant.</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Linear Indication:</strong> </span>Any indication with a length greater than three times the width.</p>
<p><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>Rounded Indication:</strong> </span>Any indication with a length equal to or less than three times the width. A rounded indication may be of circular or elliptical shape.</p>
<h4><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Acceptance Criteria for Magnetic Particle Examination (Mandatory Appendix 6):</strong></span></h4>
<p>All surfaces to be examined shall be free of:</p>
<p>(a) Relevant linear indications shall be rejected.</p>
<p>(b) Relevant rounded indications greater than 5 mm (3/16 in.) shall be rejected.</p>
<p>(c) Four or more relevant rounded indications in a line separated by 1.5 mm (1/16 in.) or less (edge to edge).</p>
<h6><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Please watch the video (given below) for more clarity on acceptance criteria for Liquid Penetrant Test (LPT/DPT) and Magnetic Particle Test (MPT);</strong></span></h6>
<p><iframe title="[English] Acceptance criteria for DPT and MPT (ASME Section VIII Div 1)" width="800" height="450" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ZFpvwOkL-BA?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>To learn about the different <span style="color: #ff0000;">types of welding defects, causes, and their remedies</span>, Please <a href="https://www.weldingandndt.com/welding-defects/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">click here</a></h3>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span id="more-1186"></span></p>
<h3><strong><span style="color: #ff00ff;">“Live each day as if your life had just begun.”</span> <span style="color: #008000;">– Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe</span></strong></h3>
<h5><a href="https://www.fosterquotes.com/21-most-inspirational-quotes-for-success/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>Click here to read the most inspirational quotes.</strong></span></a></h5>The post <a href="https://www.weldingandndt.com/acceptance-criteria-for-weld-defects/">Acceptance Criteria for Weld Defects</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.weldingandndt.com">welding & NDT</a>.]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.weldingandndt.com/acceptance-criteria-for-weld-defects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 25/52 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 18/43 queries in 0.031 seconds using Disk

Served from: www.weldingandndt.com @ 2026-06-05 13:07:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->